It works perfectly securing the camera or the lens. The only issue I have with it is the fact that it is too versatile for what I need. The BH-40 was designed to be a tripod ball head. It is designed to adjust on any axis.

The problem with the monopod is that I really didn’t need that kind of flexibility. What I really need is a smaller head with forward/aft adjustments. The other axis is easily adjusted by leaning the monopod rather than adjusting the ball head and trying to keep the monopod perpendicular.

The BH-40 ball head is larger and heavier than what I need for a monopod. Reluctantly I began searching for a monopod head to replace the ball head. I should note that in no way am I unsatisfied with the quality or workings of the BH-40. On the contrary, it is so good that I am now planning to replace my tripod with a new one just so that I can use the BH-40.

As I began searching for a new monopod head I again turned my attention to one of my favorite photography accessory vendors. I went to the Really Right Stuff web site to see if perchance they made a head specifically for monopods.

After perusing their web site I finally found what I was looking for, the MH-01. I say perusing the site not because it is hard to find things there. Rather there is so much good information that I find myself spending an inordinate amount of time reading.

The web site not only has product information but also contains several articles about choosing the right ball head, tripod, camera plates etc. This information should not be overlooked as it gives the reader a very good idea of what they really need and more importantly offers suggestions for accessories or configurations you may not have thought of.

After going through the various configurations I settled on the MH-01 LR with B2 AS II Clamp. I selected this particular configuration, as I liked the idea of having a quick release clamp with the monopod head.

Most of time when I am shooting with the tripod I am doing so at sporting events. When I have to change cameras or lenses I like the idea of just pulling a quick release rather than rotating a knob to remove the camera from the head.

I am usually doing this by touch and since the fore/aft adjustment is already a knob I didn’t really want to confuse the two knobs during a shoot. It’s more personal preference than anything. On the BH-40 ball head I went with the B2-Pro II clamp because I wanted the security of a knob for keeping the camera attached to the head.

The great thing about Really Right Stuff is that no matter which one you choose it is easily adapted to another clamp with just one Allen screw. So if I decide later that I really like the knob configuration of the clamp I can interchange it with the BH-40 to give me the setup I want.

The MH-01 Monopod Head is of the same high quality as the other Really Right Stuff products. It is precisely machined to very tight tolerances. From a user’s perspective it feels well built and works just as you would expect.

With the cost of digital SLR cameras and lenses the last thing I wanted was to trust a cheap ball head to secure my equipment. With Really Right Stuff that is never a concern. The clamps and the head are secure and remain so in almost any condition.

The knobs and adjustments are easy to grasp and turn even when wearing gloves during cold weather. This is especially helpful when in the field and you need to make a quick adjustment to capture the shot.

Overall I have been extremely impressed with the MH-01 and would gladly recommend this product to anyone who is looking for a monopod head that will securely hold your camera equipment. It’s manufactured to the highest quality making it a piece of equipment that will last a lifetime. This may very well be the only monopod head you will ever buy.

I have to admit; when I bought the monopod I inaccurately assumed it came with some type of head to mount the camera to it. When the monopod arrived you can imagine my surprise when I found that all it had was a threaded bolt at the top.

Of course I had procrastinated and waited until just before a soccer tournament before buying the monopod leaving myself relatively no time to get something that would work in time to cover the event. Even if I had all the time in the world I had no idea what I was looking for.

I began searching the Internet for information on heads that could be used with tripods and monopods. One manufacturer continued to be talked about with several positive reviews. That company was Really Right Stuff.

I went to their web site and after reading about all of their products I was still very confused as to what it was I actually needed. Fortunately they had a way to contact them. I immediately called and talked to one of their sales people.

The company was extremely helpful and after a brief conversation we determined that what I needed was a Really Right Stuff BH-40 Ballhead with a quick release lever. The BH-40 is their midrange ballhead and allows loads up to 18 pounds, which is perfect for what I was looking for to use with the monopod.

Although the product was currently out of stock they were expecting more in any day. As I hung up the phone I was feeling depressed that I had waited until the last minute and would not be able to get what I needed.

That depression was short lived though. About an hour later I received a call from Really Right Stuff and they were able to get the ballhead I needed and configured it with the appropriate clamps. They shipped the item priority and it arrived the day before the soccer tournament began.

Armed with the Gitzo GM3551 and the Really Right Stuff BH-40 I headed out to cover the soccer tournament with equipment I had never used before. That is normally a recipe for disaster but these two products were so intuitive that by the end of the first quarter of the first game I felt as though I had been using these products forever.

The ballhead worked flawlessly holding my Nikon D300 with the 80-400 lens securely to allow me to get the shots without fighting with hand holding the equipment. At the end of the two days of shooting I covered roughly eight games and yet my arm didn’t feel the strain I had experienced at previous events.

The BH-40 securely held the camera and lens leaving me free to worry about the creative process instead of the mechanical issues of camera shake. Perhaps the best endorsement I can give is the fact that I didn’t have to think about the ballhead. It blended into the background of my mind while I was shooting.
The quality of workmanship on this device is first rate. It will no doubt outlast all of the cameras and lenses that I have. It has found a place in my camera bag and is one of the few devices I won’t leave home without on the day of a shoot.

A big thanks to Really Right Stuff for not only providing a great product but awesome customer service. This is a company I plan on endorsing for a very long time. They are definitely near the top of my list for photography accessories.

Part of the problem with buying a bag over the Internet is that you never quite know how big it really is. I read the description of this bag but still did not have a clear vision of the size. I placed an order thinking I knew how big it was but when it arrived I was slightly stunned. This is by no means a small bag. It is large enough to require a waist belt and for good reason. The bag itself is capable of holding quite a lot of equipment. To give you an idea let me share with you what I had in the bag during my last assignment.
I was able to include a Nikon D300 camera with a Nikkor 80-400mm lens, a Nikon D200 camera with a Nikkor 18-200mm lens, a Nikkor 70-200 f/2.8 lens, two Nikon SB800 flash units, a Nikkor 17-55mm f/2.8 lens, a Gitzo GM3551 monopod (strapped to the outside), an assortment of batteries, filters, lens caps, cleaning supplies, 12 Compact Flash memory cards, an Apple MacBook Pro 15″, and the power cables and connections for the computer. All of this gear fit comfortably in the backpack. Once loaded it was by no means lightweight but I at least felt like the gear was protected and I could carry everything I needed in 1 bag.
The construction of the bag is first rate. The zippers are heavy duty and the velcro seems to be top notch. There are several adjustments that can be made to make the bag fit well. Fully loaded the weight seems to be distributed well so it was not overly painful to carry it. I would not want to hike for days with this on my back but over the course of several hours covering a soccer tournament it worked pretty well. The base is fairly square so it stands up on the ground pretty well. While I like the waist strap for carrying it, it does get in the way when you are not wearing the backpack. I wish there was a way of removing the waist strap but unfortunately that doesn’t seem to be possible. Overall I like the idea, just be aware that it is pretty large so don’t be too surprised by the large box it is delivered in.

I already had a Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8D ED Autofocus VR Zoom lens that I was using to try and capture the action on the soccer field. This is my favorite lens and works great especially in low light and high-speed action shots to freeze the ball and player. The problem was that it just wasn’t quite long enough to reach out and get that close up shot across the field. Since most of my shooting was as a parent with no possibility of making money I knew my options for a new lens was limited. I sat down to begin making a list of requirements and where I would be willing to make compromises to meet my needs in a cost effective manner.
From this exercise I established the following criteria:

• Minimum of 300mm length to capture action from a distance
• Total length of the lens must be less than 11 inches
• Width of lens must be less than 5.5 inches
• Lens should be sufficiently fast enough to shoot hand held
• Autofocus must be fast enough to capture moving players in game action
• Lens must be compatible with DX and full frame cameras
• Low light abilities would be preferred for shooting dusk and night games
• Lens must be Nikkor brand

Obviously a lens meeting the above capabilities is not possible so some of these criteria would not be met. Before deciding that though I should probably explain the why behind some of these statements. The 300mm length should be self-explanatory. Since a soccer field is larger than a football field and many tournaments quarantine photographers to a specific area it becomes necessary to have a long focal length to capture action that is occurring across the field.
The length and width of the lens at first might seem like strange requirements. The reason they are there are because some sporting venues such as MLB, NBA, and NFL stadiums are now cracking down on fans bringing “professional” cameras and lenses. After contacting the local teams and stadiums it seems that at least in Phoenix they have defined “professional” lens as being longer than 11 inches or having a lens opening larger than 5.5 inches. These measurements were devised to allow an usher to check equipment using a piece of paper. The lens can’t be longer than the paper or wider than half a sheet of paper. I know, it sounds random to me too but if I am getting a new lens I need to make sure I am able to use it in all venues.
Many stadiums also prohibit the use of tripods and monopods meaning that the lens must be able to be used as a handheld model and produce sufficient results. Since most of my shooting is sports action the autofocus motor needs to react quickly to make sure the subject is spot on focus. Many of the fields are poorly lit or have dark areas so a fast lens would take precedence over a slower one. I prefer the quality of the Nikkor lenses. I’ve had very good luck with the Nikon brand and want to continue to use them where possible. Finally I currently have a DX format camera but hope to move up to a full frame. I would prefer not to have to replace the lens when I make the camera switch.
Given the above criteria my choices quickly diminished to where the most logical selection was the Nikkor AF VR Zoom 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6D ED lens. This was one of Nikon’s earliest VR lenses and provides the necessary length for me to reach action at long distance. The lens itself is fairly heavy weighing 48 ounces. The weight is both a blessing and curse. On the plus side its bulk provides a good balance to the camera itself. On the minus side, this lens on a Nikon D300 is HEAVY! This will take its toll on you after 4 or 5 games where you are holding it up all day.
The focusing motor is on the slow side and there have been times when the pictures were not in focus due to the motor not being able to adapt quick enough. It requires you to be a little more creative and plan the shot or at least the distance ahead of time on a breakaway. I would love to have had a slightly faster lens than f/4.5-5.6. I typically shoot at f/4 to get the necessary depth of field so having 1.5-2 f/stops more makes some of the shots seem a little cluttered due to the focusing plane. It’s not extremely bad but is not necessarily optimal.
I’ve taken this lens attached to a D300 camera to several events and in all cases it has passed through security without any question as to its length. Fortunately in this case the zoom mechanism changes the length of the lens so if I keep it at 80mm when going through security it is well within the 11 inch length limit. With a diameter of 3.6 inches that too makes it well within the rules. Some of the security personnel have commented on how nice the camera and lens were but none have complained that it was out of compliance.
The pictures produced with this lens have been very good and I have had several people comment on the quality and length. The action seems to come alive with the extreme focal length. This lens has definitely found a place in my bag when I am shooting action sports especially in daylight when the overall speed has less significance. In low light it does falter but with the noise reduction capabilities of the D300 bumping the ISO has resulted in successful pictures. If you have similar needs as I did I suggest looking at the Nikkor AF VR Zoom 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6D ED lens.

The larger sensor sizes in the DSLR cameras provide better noise management especially when using higher ISO settings for lower light shooting. The ability to have a hot shoe flash that moves the flash further away from the sensor plane is also a huge advantage as it results in fewer red-eye pictures being taken. I have never been a fan of red-eye reduction flash since all it really does is pre-flash to fool the eye.

The problem with this is that the subject thinks the pre-flash is the actual picture so you end up many times with people moving or closing their eyes since they think the picture has been taken. That drives me crazy. But for all the benefits of a DSLR there is one thing about them that can be troublesome, their size.

There are just some times when you can’t justify the bulky body and lens combinations that are required for a DSLR. If you have to carry a camera all day with most of your activities being non-photo focused; it can be a pain carrying a DSLR with lens. And I mean pain literally since some of these combinations can be quite heavy. It is situations such as this where a point and shoot camera can be justified.

You may just want to document a moment without going through the creative process that a DSLR requires. Another justification around our house for a point and shoot camera is one of ease of use.

While I feel right at home dealing with f-stops, shutter speeds, and ISO settings; there are others (namely my wife Trina) who just want something where they can press a button and take a picture. They don’t want to have to worry about 54-element auto focus screens, the differences between scene and spot metering, and other nuances that accompany a DSLR.

I tend to get frustrated very quickly with the limitations of a point and shoot camera. I love the small size and the ability to slide it into my pocket when I want to take a camera “just in case”. In the end though I usually am unhappy with the results due to the camera not living up to my expectations of what a real camera should provide.

So Trina and I are constantly at odds with one another about whether we should get a point and shoot or remain a DSLR household. For the most part the DSLR wins out but every so often she talks me into a point and shoot.
The latest in this back and forth tug-of-war occurred this weekend.

Trina again complained when he pictures did not turn out the way she wanted them due to the camera being “too technical”. Rather than listen to this argument for the millionth time I decided it was once again time to try a point and shoot camera. After a lengthy research of what cameras were available I finally decided upon the Canon G9.

It is a point and shoot camera by form factor only. It is one of the few non-DSLR cameras that offer RAW as a capture format. I am a big fan of RAW files as it gives me an opportunity to adjust things in post-production that may have been missed during shooting. When dealing with a wife and children who may not be willing or capable of remembering all the settings they want RAW gives me an added line of defense.

It does mean that I have to deal with the photos after the fact rather than just taking the memory card to the local photo-mart for prints. Still RAW has save me on too many occasions to discount its importance.

The G9 also provides the ability to shoot with pictures closely in aspect ratio to what I get with an SLR. Since many of our photos end up in videos and slide shows I like the aspect ratio to be similar among all the cameras to minimize the amount of cropping I have to do to make the pictures consistent. While I may lose time dealing with converting RAW files, I make up the time by not having to crop files for consistency.

I was also impressed with the Canon G9 having a hot shoe that will allow the use of a full flash unit. This will eliminate a lot of the red-eye and give me the opportunity to do some creative flash shots that would be impossible with an in camera flash. The G9 is obviously positioned to the upper end of the point and shoot spectrum and many of the features would be wasted on those who normally buy cameras to document life events.

It may just be the perfect compromise to allow ease of use for Trina while giving me the control I want in a smaller form factor. As I start to get more familiar with the camera I’ll post some photo examples and provide a more detailed entry of what I think of the camera.

I’ve now had the Nikon D300 for 2 months and during that time I have shot over 1200 pictures. Some of these have been posted on 1Photo2Share and others are being readied to be part of an online album on my web site. I thought I would provide a little feedback on this camera and my experiences with it. My shooting style is action oriented and I am constantly challenging myself and the camera to focus and shoot quickly trying to capture each fleeting moment. The D300 is quite suited to this style assuming the lens is capable of complying. What I mean by that is that the D300 seems to focus relatively quickly and maintain that focus through the shot. The camera is bound by the speed of focus of the lens not the other way around. That means that if you have a fast focusing lens you can get quite a few shots off.
I take a lot of pictures at Chase Field. This is probably because I spend a lot of time at Chase Field. I usually try to take my camera to at least one game every series. I am usually shooting form my seat in Section 112 and I will use either the Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8 lens or the Nikkor 18-200mm f/4.5-5.6 lens. On those days that I carry the 70-200mm I am able to get several shots in a burst capturing a pitcher’s wind-up or a batters swing. The focus is flawless and fast. The same cannot be said for the 18-200mm lens. Its focusing motor is much slower and I am unable to get as many shots as I do with the 70-200mm. I like the flexibility of the 18-200mm lens and the ability to carry just one lens but I do miss some shots because of its lack of speed. The 18-200mm being much slower also challenges the D300 and requires me to use a much higher ISO to capture the action of a baseball game. With the Nikon D200 I would end up with a grainy picture that I would have to manipulate in post-production. I don’t have that problem with the D300. Its noise level software is much better than previous generations of the Nikon DSLR cameras. This has opened up my creativity without having to worry so much about lower levels of light coupled with higher ISO settings.
Battery life on the D300 seems very comparable to what I experienced with the D200. I am able to continuously shoot game action and not have to stop to replace the battery. This is much better than I had when the D100 was first released. I don’t know whether the extended battery life is a result of better power management within the camera or better battery construction but either way I’m happy. I do keep an extra battery pack with me just in case but very rarely am I required to use it.
The color rendition of the D300 is fairly good but still a little muted for my tastes. I therefore have to tweak the color and saturation slightly when I bring the pictures into my editing program. I think I was spoiled in the film era by shooting Fuji Velvia and therefore like things a little brighter. I’m sure there is probably a setting in the D300 that will allow me to modify that a little but I have been so busy with games and events that I have not had a chance to completely go through the manual.
Speaking of manuals, the one that comes with the Nikon D300 is adequate but leaves a lot of unanswered questions in my mind. Third-party books on the D300 have been quite sparse with many of the major publishers not having technical manuals available yet. Several field guides are scheduled to be released in the next month so hopefully I’ll pick one of those up and review it at a later date.
Overall I have been very happy with the Nikon D300. The 18-200mm f/4.5-5.6 lens is a good everyday lens but does suffer from a slower focusing motor making it better suited for family events than for serious stop-action shooting. I would highly recommend the 70-200mm f/2.8 lens but you should be aware that the size of this lens does make it difficult to get into many sporting events. Teams and venues have begun limiting the size of lens they allow fans to bring so you should check with the stadium before taking your camera and lens to a game. As I get more comfortable with the camera I’ll post pictures and settings that I have found that have made my life easier.